Earlier and Earlier, Hotter and Hotter: What Champagne's Earliest Harvests Mean for Our Champagne

Earlier and Earlier, Hotter and Hotter: What Champagne's Earliest Harvests Mean for Our Champagne

When I've followed the harvest reports from Champagne over the last few years, I've noticed a pattern that honestly gives me pause: the harvest keeps happening earlier and earlier, year after year. What used to take place in mid September is increasingly shifting into August. For someone who tastes and collects Champagne purely out of passion, this isn't some abstract climate debate anymore, it's something I can taste in the glass.

Why is the harvest happening so early in the first place?

The grapes used for Champagne, Chardonnay, Pinot Noir, Pinot Meunier, need one thing above all for the typical style: acidity. And acidity develops when grapes ripen slowly in a rather cool climate. As average temperatures rise, the grapes ripen faster and sugar levels shoot up while acidity drops. Winegrowers then face a decision: harvest early to preserve the acid structure, or wait longer to gain aromatic complexity but lose freshness.

Heat waves and dry spells, like the ones the region has experienced in recent summers, make this dilemma even more pressing. When temperatures stay above 35 degrees Celsius for days on end, grapes can ripen so quickly that winegrowers are literally racing against the clock to catch the right moment for harvest. I've read that some estates start picking at four or five in the morning, simply because it's still cool enough then to harvest the grapes gently.

What this means for the taste

Champagne lives and breathes acidity. It's the backbone that makes the perlage dance, that gives the wine that electrifying freshness which sets it apart from a simple sparkling wine. When the base wines come from years that were too warm and too dry, I often notice a certain roundness that can be pleasant, but that lacks the razor sharp precision I love so much in classic Champagne.

At the same time, I don't want to paint too bleak a picture. Some of the warmer vintages have surprised me with an unusual richness of fruit, ripe apricot, peach, sometimes even exotic notes you'd classically expect from warmer wine regions. As an enthusiast, I find that fascinating to watch: Champagne is changing stylistically, whether we want it to or not.

How are the houses responding to this?

What impresses me as I taste and read up on this is how adaptable the region is. Many estates are experimenting with later budding vine clones, adjusting canopy height to provide more shade, or planting rows closer together. There's even discussion about whether new grape varieties should eventually be added to the approved list, something that sounds almost revolutionary in a region as tradition minded as Champagne.

Reserve wines are also playing an increasingly important role. Precisely because vintages are becoming less predictable, houses are drawing more heavily on their reserves to keep their Cuvées consistent. That's essentially exactly what Champagne's Solera like system was originally meant for: a buffer against difficult years. Except these "difficult years" are now occurring more often than before.

My honest take

I'm no climate scientist and no winegrower, but based on what I've tasted at home across many different vintages over the years, I believe we're currently witnessing a stylistic shift that will only really become visible in a few years' time. The Champagnes I drink today often still come from base wines harvested before the recent intensification of heat waves. What ends up in the glass in five or ten years might taste different, not necessarily worse, but definitely different.

What personally occupies my mind the most is this: the early harvests aren't just a weather phenomenon of individual years, they're a trend. And trends in agriculture mean long term adaptation. For us as enthusiasts, that might mean saying goodbye to the idea that Champagne is a drink that never changes. But maybe that's exactly what makes it exciting: a living product that responds to its environment, just as it always has, only now faster and more visibly.

In any case, I'll keep paying close attention to which vintages were picked when, and try to taste out these differences with my next glass. In the end, that's the best part of this hobby for me: understanding why a Champagne tastes the way it does.

Questions about this article?

I don't claim to be error-free, if you notice something or have a question, write it here.

Powered by The Champagne Guy

Newsletter

Tastings, straight to your inbox.

New tastings, grower portraits and honest notes. Irregular, never dull, unsubscribe anytime.

Tulip not Flute